🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an adorable small “playful character”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a sizeable but fiercely protective friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “constant motion” and moves like a worm. Lillooet is the “loving presence” with a heart of gold.

A group of thirty enclosed marine mammals in a Canadian entertainment facility have become pawns in a tussle between a defunct facility, public officials and animal rights activists.

But those working directly with the whales say the impassioned debate over their fate often fails to consider the complexities of the whales who, after spending their lives in confinement, have been carefully observed by the caretakers who see them each day.

After the federal government blocked the transfer of the belugas to a foreign facility, the struggling attraction near Niagara Falls where they are housed threatened to end their lives unless the government pays for the cost of their care. The nation’s marine resources official has denied that demand, placing the 30 whales in an ever more uncertain situation.

Intelligent Sea Creatures

Scientists say that beluga whales’ neural makeup, along with their vocal imitation skills, intellectual tasks and social skills indicate they are highly cognitive mammals – something Kristy Burgess observed first-hand.

She spent several years as a whale caretaker, a job that required gaining confidence of the sea creatures.

“Developing those bonds over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of affection. At the outset, they’re very wary of you,” she said. “In time, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so wonderful and rewarding.”

Burgess knew the whales were highly intelligent, but she says she was nonetheless amazed by the details and quirks in their personalities. She cultivated a deep bond for Eve and Cleopatra with opposing temperaments.

“Eve accepted me. The other demanded work,” she said. “They changed the way I perceive connection.”

Public Concerns and Deteriorating Conditions

Her connection with the whales progressed against a backdrop of rising activist criticism to their enclosure.

During her tenure at the facility, multiple belugas and the park’s single killer whale, Kiska, succumbed. In total, 19 belugas have died at the park since 2019, a number which the facility links to expected lifespan, but which campaigners say reflects the poor conditions in which they were kept.

The facility did not open to the public over the summer, but the former trainer says she observed directly results of the closure. “Structural materials is deteriorating from the enclosures because they’re degrading and not being fixed. The whales are curious and so they take pieces and navigate with chunks in their jaws. It’s distressing to see.”

The facility did not respond to a inquiry, but previously asserted: “The whales … get far superior medical attention and 24/7 attention than any human in the Britain, or other places.”

Uncertain Future and Potential Resolutions

Burgess was dismissed from the facility in recent months following the death of a beluga, an unwell beluga the park staff had to humanely kill. She said the park believed details of the death were shared to the media and she was let go shortly thereafter.

The uncertainty over the whales’ future has left Burgess and staff members in anguish. She says the facility’s ultimatum to kill its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “extremely difficult” task, adding any plans to put down even a one beluga would require “immense personnel”, equipment and heavy equipment.

“It cannot happen in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.

She backs requests for the whales to be removed promptly from the facility, with its crumbling tanks and reduced personnel.

In the autumn, the nation’s government official turned down a request to transfer the whales to an overseas location.

“Allowing the application would have meant a continued life in confinement and a return to display for amusement,” the minister wrote. “As the public, we know that belugas should be in the wild, not in enclosures for our enjoyment. I could not in ethical standing authorize an transfer that would perpetuate the conditions these belugas have suffered.”

But the former trainer said the minister’s comments reveal a more general lack of awareness of the circumstances of existence for belugas raised in confinement.

“The public needs to realize these are whales that have lived entirely in captivity and they will need constant supervision for the foreseeable future,” she said. “People just don’t realize that it’s not as easy as saying ‘end operations’.”

Alternative Habitat and Continuing Discussion

As decision makers struggle to find a resolution, proposals have surfaced, some of which have minimal feasibility. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be let go into the wilds of northern regions – where whales are a key source of nourishment for Indigenous peoples.

A suggested protected area in the region of Nova Scotia, which now received regulatory clearance, has proven contentious. The future location, which includes 100 acres of protected cove, remains undeveloped. Advocates remain positive that it could ultimately represent a sustainable resolution for eight of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among staff she’s discussed with, there is “doubts there” about what she said is “only an untested concept” in the whales’ future.

Some experts say the possibility of a protected habitat represents a worldwide trend away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a feasible plan in the short term.

Charles Vinick, head of the initiative, said the site will simulate the mental engagement and feeding regimen the whales receive from specialists, albeit in a much larger space. He said after the medical condition of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|